It has been 13 years since the old structure that stood in place of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya was brought down and a make shift temple was built in its place.
So many ups and downs and changes in the history of Bharath since then.
Hindus thought that, a grand temple will take shape once BJP government comes in the centre.
The BJP govt came, ruled for 6 years and got defeated.
We the people, don't know what efforts it did in the direction of temple building!?
Till to date, temple is a distant dream.
The RSS and VHP had very seriously taken up this issue and made many sacrifices!
But BJP took the advantage and came to the centre stage of Indian politics.
They utilized people like Uma Bharathi and Sadvi Ritambara to win elections.
Today Uma Bharathi is expelled from the party!!
The party which was started to cleanse the Indian politics has taken the same path as that of Congress.
I don't see any difference between the today's BJP and Congress!
Hindus should not depend on these political parties to get their work done.
They have to unite behind RSS or VHP and fight for their cause.
I feel pained to see that many of my hindu friends still don't understand the issue of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. They talk about secularism when Ayodhya issue comes up.
The reason can be that, we read only the news magazines and believe whatever comes in that.
Nobody tries to check the facts. Nobody reads history!!
I asked my friend, in what way Ayodhya fight is against secularism?
He said, you people destroyed the mosque which belongs to Muslims and want to build a Hindu temple in its place.
So, I asked him, who is Babar? Why did he destroy the Ram temple?
He was in a distant land and for what purpose he came upto Ayodhya?
My friend didn't have the answer.
He appreciates the fact that Babar is an invader.
I also told him that, the muslims of our country are our muslims.
They are not descendents of Babar.
When somebody invades our country, we should not look at his religion/caste and then decide whether he is an enemy to me or not.
So, even though Babar is a muslim, he is an enemy to each and every muslim in this country.
He wanted to announce his victory over this country and that's the reason he destroyed the famous temple in Ayodhya. So, it was a black mark in History of Bharath.
So, Ayodhya fight is not against muslims or any other caste.
But, the politics made it more confusing and our media was always there to add more confusion.
All of them made it out that, it is against muslims (thinking that they will get bulk votes of muslims)!!
Hope a beautiful Ram Mandir will be built soon.
And that muslims understand that they are the children of this soil only and not descendents of Babar.
Pages
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
December 6 - Another aniversary of the great day
It has been 13 years since the old structure that stood in place of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya was brought down and a make shift temple was built in its place.
So many ups and downs and changes in the history of Bharath since then.
Hindus thought that, a grand temple will take shape once BJP government comes in the centre.
The BJP govt came, ruled for 6 years and got defeated.
We the people, don't know what efforts it did in the direction of temple building!?
Till to date, temple is a distant dream.
The RSS and VHP had very seriously taken up this issue and made many sacrifices!
But BJP took the advantage and came to the centre stage of Indian politics.
They utilized people like Uma Bharathi and Sadvi Ritambara to win elections.
Today Uma Bharathi is expelled from the party!!
The party which was started to cleanse the Indian politics has taken the same path as that of Congress.
I don't see any difference between the today's BJP and Congress!
Hindus should not depend on these political parties to get their work done.
They have to unite behind RSS or VHP and fight for their cause.
I feel pained to see that many of my hindu friends still don't understand the issue of Ram Mandir in Ayodhya. They talk about secularism when Ayodhya issue comes up.
The reason can be that, we read only the news magazines and believe whatever comes in that.
Nobody tries to check the facts. Nobody reads history!!
I asked my friend, in what way Ayodhya fight is against secularism?
He said, you people destroyed the mosque which belongs to Muslims and want to build a Hindu temple in its place.
So, I asked him, who is Babar? Why did he destroy the Ram temple?
He was in a distant land and for what purpose he came upto Ayodhya?
My friend didn't have the answer.
He appreciates the fact that Babar is an invader.
I also told him that, the muslims of our country are our muslims.
They are not descendents of Babar.
When somebody invades our country, we should not look at his religion/caste and then decide whether he is an enemy to me or not.
So, even though Babar is a muslim, he is an enemy to each and every muslim in this country.
He wanted to announce his victory over this country and that's the reason he destroyed the famous temple in Ayodhya. So, it was a black mark in History of Bharath.
So, Ayodhya fight is not against muslims or any other caste.
But, the politics made it more confusing and our media was always there to add more confusion.
All of them made it out that, it is against muslims (thinking that they will get bulk votes of muslims)!!
Hope a beautiful Ram Mandir will be built soon.
And that muslims understand that they are the children of this soil only and not descendents of Babar.
Monday, November 28, 2005
Churún Merú or ANGEL Falls - World's highest waterfall
In total it is 15 times higher than Niagara Falls with a total of 3212 feet.
The waters fall freely some 807 meters (2,648 feet) and reach the bottom of the valley as a misty spray that gathers into a small creek which eventually finds its way into the north-bound Churun River.
The original name of this "Highest Waterfall" is Churún Merú or Kerepakupai-merú and is known to the local Indians for a long time. (I really wonder, whether these Indians were influenced by Hindus of India!? 'Meru' is a Sanskrit word for Mountain and som many mountains of India have names ending with Meru)
But the rest of the world was not aware of it till 1933! American aviator jimmy angel first saw the falls in 1933 while searching for a valuable ore bed. He returned in 1937 with his wife, Gustavo Heny and Heny's gardener, and landed on top of the tepui. His Falamingo monoplane settled down into the marshy ground atop Auyan-tepui and remained there for 33 years before being lifted out by a helicopter. Jimmy Angel and his three comapnions managed to descend the tepui and make their way back to civilization in 11 days. And since then it has been named after him as "Angel Falls"!Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Laptops for $100!!
Wednesday, October 19, 2005
Thursday, October 13, 2005
Friday, July 29, 2005
Three disturbing news items
Friday, July 15, 2005
New chapter in (distorted) history books of NCERT says: Prithviraj coward, Jaichand hero!!
Lucknow, July 12: "Prithviraj Chauhan was a coward who ran away to save his life during the second battle of Tarain with Mohammad Ghauri."
"Jaichand (generally believed to be a traitor) was, in fact a ‘hero’ who gave up his life while fighting the forces of Ghauri."
This is the "new" history that students of Class 11 will learn under the CBSE and ICSE courses from this academic session. The revised history book, Medieval India History, published by NCERT, demolishes old beliefs and tramples over heroes of history.
Edited by Prof. Satish Chandra, the fifth chapter of the book on Medieval History clearly states that Prithviraj Chauhan tried to run away from the battle, but was taken prisoner. The book says that when Prithviraj accepted the supremacy of Mohammad Ghauri, the latter allowed him to continue as ruler of Ajmer. Prithviraj was later killed on charges of treason, according to the book, which goes on to say that Jaichand’s valour was unmatched and that he was killed while fighting the forces of Ghauri in Kannauj.
History, till now, had taught that Jaichand was a coward and a traitor who first betrayed Prithviraj Chauhan, and then was drowned while trying to flee the forces of Ghauri (History of Rajasthan, page 156).
The NCERT history book also demolishes the belief that the main cause of bitterness between Prithviraj and Jaichand was the fact that the latter’s daughter Sanyogita had eloped with Prithviraj and that Jaichand never forgave them. According to the new book, there were major political differences between the two kings and Sanyogita was not part of it.
While the NCERT book throws new light on Prithviraj Chauhan and Jaichand, the Class 11 book Ancient India History, written by Prof. Ram Sharan Sharma, discards the presence of Lord Krishna during the Mahabharata. The book says, "Although Krishna plays an important role in the Mahabharata, inscriptions and sculptural pieces found in Mathura dating back to 200 BC and 300 AD do not attest to his presence. Because of this, ideas of an epic age based on the Ramayana and Mahabharata have to be discarded."
On Ayodhya, the book says, "Archaeological evidence should be considered far more important than long family trees given in the Puranas because Puranic tradition can be used to date Ram of Ayodhya to 2,000 BC, but diggings and extensive exploration in Ayodhya do not show any settlement of the time."
The "new theories" being propounded in these history books have expectedly created controversy Uttar Pradesh. While the BJP is up in arms over references to Ayodhya and the Mahabharata, caste organisations are livid about "the attempt to demolish the aura of Prithviraj Chauhan".
State BJP president Kesri Nath Tripathi said the manner in which history was being distorted by the UPA government was nothing short of "blasphemy". He said he had already apprised the BJP leadership about the issue and would be going to Delhi shortly to finalise the party’s strategy on the issue.
Meanwhile, Mr R.K. Singh "Vishven", general secretary of the Akhil Bhartiya Kshatriya Mahasabha, has announced an agitation against the efforts of Central government to "discredit" Prithviraj Chauhan. "Prithviraj Chauhan is a kshatriya hero and we will never tolerate any attempt to rip off his aura and image," Mr Singh said.
(Courtesy: The Asian Age; July 13, 2005)
(URL: http://www.asianage.com/main.asp?layout=2&cat1=1&cat2=24&newsid=168971&RF=DefaultMain )
Will we remember 1947 after another 50 years!?
Thursday, July 14, 2005
Thursday, July 07, 2005
One of the best photographs for this year!
Tuesday, July 05, 2005
Ayodhya attacked!
Militants are at it again!
Monday, July 04, 2005
Another BIG step for science!
Friday, July 01, 2005
Beautiful - All 4 seasons!!
Thursday, June 30, 2005
Is this our Karwar!?
Rain....!?










